PRACTICE LOCATIONS: VA, DC, MD, NY, NC[email protected]
  • 202-980-3857202-980-3857

SPLF Employment Blog

Au Pair Lawsuit Highlights Minimum Wage Issues

A lawsuit in Colorado federal court could shake the legal and financial foundation of the country’s au pair program, in which women from foreign countries live with American families and help with childcare. Agencies involved in the program claim this is a cultural exchange where participants are paid a federally mandated $195.75 a week (or $4.35/hour).

However, the lead plaintiff, Johana Paola Beltran, a Columbian au pair who lived with a family outside Denver, contends she should have been paid at least the minimum wage for her services (currently $8.25 in Colorado).

What Happened to Beltran?

After Beltran graduated from high school in Bogota, Colombia, she learned about a program that would send her to the United States to become an au pair in a rich suburb of Denver, according to the Washington Post.

Beltran’s experience wasn’t what she’d expected.

  • After arriving in New York City for orientation, she wasn’t paid for the days she spent in training.
  • She also did numerous tasks for her host family, who had four children: she cooked their dinner but couldn’t eat with them, cleaned the house, did the laundry, gardened, and took care of the family’s eight chickens. There were times when Beltran didn’t have enough food and went hungry.

She was compensated with room, board, and pay of $195.75 per week ($4.35 per hour). Her pay met federal standards for au pairs but is far less than Colorado’s minimum wage.

The Plaintiffs’ Claims

The plaintiffs, including Beltran and four more au pairs, claim the agency they used, InterExchange, and other au pair agencies keep wages artificially low in violation of antitrust laws and pay less than the mandatory state minimum wage rate.

Towards Justice, a legal aid organization that helps low-wage workers in Colorado, represents the plaintiffs. It argues that the sponsor agencies have turned the au pair program into a source for the cheapest childcare in America—a purpose that’s very different from its original intent to serve as a cultural exchange program. The lawsuit seeks punitive damages and backpay for as many as 30,000 current and former au pairs.

“There is no question that American families need affordable childcare,” Nina DiSalvo, Towards Justice’s executive director, told the Post. She continued, “But if that is the au pair program’s purpose, then we as a country should be honest about it and regulate it like other migrant domestic worker programs: through the U.S. Department of Labor.”

The Defendants’ Arguments

The defendants are 15 sponsoring agencies that assert the au pair program is a cultural exchange, not a labor program. Agencies advertise au pairs to potential host families as a cheaper alternative to nannies, and the cost doesn’t rise regardless of the number of children in a household. The lawsuit claims agency officials stated in conversations that the industry wanted to keep the pay at $197.50, so “the stipend is identical across all companies.”

The defendants deny suppressing pay rates, which are set by the State Department, the agency that oversees the program. They also suggest that if anyone is responsible, it’s the sponsoring families who should be paying au pairs the minimum wage.

Further, the defendants maintain the State Department never informed them of the need to follow state and local minimum wage laws. The State Department told the Post that it has informed the agencies that they need to comply with those state and local wage laws.

Finally, the defendants argue that the court should dismiss claims involving the state minimum wage laws because those laws are pre-empted by the federal laws that regulate the au pair program.

Do You Need Legal Counsel?

Regardless of whether you’re an au pair or employed in another line of work, if you’re not paid at least the minimum wage, you need to get legal advice. Whatever label or title your job may have, if you’re being paid less than the minimum wage, there’s a good chance your employer is breaking the law, whether that’s a federal, state, or local law (or a combination of them).

If you have any questions or concerns about your pay, contact our office so we can talk about your situation, your legal rights, and your best options for moving forward.



Share this post

Latest Articles

The Biggest Theft That Nobody Is Talking About

The Biggest Theft That Nobody Is Talking About

At a time when billionaire extraordinaire Elon Musk is dominating headlines with his multi-billion-dollar buying spree, there is another story worth billions that is curiously absent from our Twitter feeds. Unfortunately, rather than recount the spending of riches, this story tells the tale of one of the greatest thefts in American history. Every hour, millions …

The Biggest Theft That Nobody Is Talking About Read More »

Maryland Passes Two Bills To Strengthen Anti-discrimination and Harassment Protection In The Workplace

Maryland Passes Two Bills To Strengthen Anti-discrimination and Harassment Protection In The Workplace

Last night the Maryland General Assembly passed two bills, SB 450 and SB 451, which will increase protections for victims of harassment and discrimination in the workplace.  SB 450 eliminates the ‘severe or pervasive’ standard for harassment claims and creates a new standard for harassment claims in the workplace. The prior ‘severe or pervasive’ standard …

Maryland Passes Two Bills To Strengthen Anti-discrimination and Harassment Protection In The Workplace Read More »

DMV Survey Series: Wage Theft Edition

DMV Survey Series: Wage Theft Edition

*In this series, the author will explore the differences in specific areas of the law between D.C., Maryland, and Virginia, and hopefully answer the age-old question: which state is best for employees? Please remember that this blog post, like all of our posts, offers general information and is NOT legal advice. – Upon reading this …

DMV Survey Series: Wage Theft Edition Read More »

The Supreme Court Decides to Block and Uphold Biden’s Vaccination Mandates

The Supreme Court Decides to Block and Uphold Biden’s Vaccination Mandates

On January 13, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court made two major decisions. These related to President Biden’s attempts to increase the number of workers who are fully vaccinated against the coronavirus. The first decision temporarily blocked the vaccinate-or-test regulation that applied to employers with 100 or more employees. The second decision allowed the vaccination requirement …

The Supreme Court Decides to Block and Uphold Biden’s Vaccination Mandates Read More »

Talk To A Real Person