SPLF Employment Blog

woman using social media apps on her phone

Suing an Employer? Be Careful What You Post On Social Media

For better or for worse, social media’s influence has been felt in almost all aspects of society and life, including the workplace. You probably already understand that what you put online can harm your employment prospects.  Just ask Ken Jennings and his lost chance to host Jeopardy! due to controversial tweets he made years ago.

But what’s on social media can also become an issue if you decide to file a lawsuit. To explain how, let’s first take a brief look at the anatomy of a typical civil suit.

The Stages of a Typical Civil Suit

Whether you’re suing your employer for a violation of an employment law or an individual in a personal injury case, the stages in civil litigation are basically the same.

First, you have the pleadings stage. This is where the plaintiff files a complaint and the defendant files an answer to the complaint. During this stage, a defendant might also file a motion to dismiss.

The second stage is discovery. This is where each side will ask the other side to produce information that’s not privileged, but is reasonably likely to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.

Third, we have the trial. Often before trial, one or both parties will file a motion for summary judgment in an attempt to win the case (or win on a particular issue) without having to go to trial.

Fourth, there are post-trial motions (if applicable) and/or an appeal.

For the rest of this blog post, we’ll focus on the discovery stage.

The Discovery Stage

The funny thing about discovery is that it doesn’t have to involve a request or exchange of information that will be used at trial. Rather, the discovery request may ask for information that will either:

  • Be admissible at trial, or
  • Is reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.

This second point means that parties will go on what many believe is a “fishing expedition.” This involves asking for information that you don’t have a reasonable basis to believe exists or can be used at trial. Let’s use a hypothetical case to illustrate.

Let’s say you’re suing your employer for wrongful termination. You believe you were fired because of your race. Your employer denies your allegation and claims you were fired because of poor performance.

During discovery, you’ll look for evidence to support your claim of racial discrimination. Examples of documentary evidence could ask for might include:

  • A copy of your personnel file.
  • An email exchange between your boss and the director of human resources discussing the basis for your firing.
  • A copy of your performance evaluations.

You’ll also probably send a set of interrogatories to your employer asking questions relating to the basis for your firing. Finally, you’ll want to take a deposition of one or more employees involved in the decision to fire you. This might include your boss and the director of human resources.

You can see how all of these requests are reasonable in that they relate to your legal allegations and there’s a reasonable chance you could uncover evidence that you could use at trial.

Okay, but what if you also asked your boss for all text messages on his personal phone? It’s going to be very difficult to get that information. You’ll need to show that there’s a reasonable chance that your boss’ phone contains one or more text messages about you that show racial discrimination or could help you find evidence that might show racial discrimination.

If the employer’s attorney asks you why you want those text messages and all you can say is, “I just have a hunch that the boss used a derogatory name for me based on my race in one of his texts,” then your discovery request will probably be denied. But if you can provide a reasonable basis as to why you think such a text exists, you might succeed in getting your boss to comply with your discovery request.

For instance, you might have a coworker who told you that he overheard the boss bragging about sending racially insensitive texts about subordinates to his college friend. This could be enough to form a reasonable basis to justify the discovery request for your boss’ text messages.

You might need to first take your coworker’s deposition to support your likely motion to compel (more on what that is, below). And your request will probably be limited to just texts your boss made about you. But there’s a decent chance the employer will have to respond to your discovery request.

So where am I going with this? When it comes to discovery in a lawsuit, there’s almost no such thing as privacy. Privileged information is protected, such as certain communications with your attorney, doctor, accountant or spouse. But text messages with a friend? Social media posts? All of this is fair game, as long as the party asking for the information has a reasonable basis for doing so.

Discovery and Social Media

If you’re going to file a lawsuit, understand that anything the other side can reasonably show might contain admissible evidence at trial is potentially subject to a discovery request. So make sure you’re okay with your employer seeing information you’d rather keep private. This includes not just social media accounts, but medical records, journals, text messages, call records and letters.

If you fight the discovery request, the other side will probably file what’s called a motion to compel. As its name implies, it’s a motion asking the court to compel you to turn over the requested information (assuming it exists, of course).

And no, you can’t refuse to hand over the information because you don’t think you remember the password for your social media account or something along those lines. If there are reasonable steps you can take to acquire the information, you must take those steps.

The court probably won’t expect you to hire a data forensic expert to recover lost information from a hard drive platter on Facebook’s servers across the country. But if you can reset your password to gain access to an old account by just sending an email or making a phone call, you’ll be expected to do that.

If you refuse to comply with your opponent’s discovery request, and don’t have a legally justified reason for the refusal, the other side will file a motion for sanctions. Here, they’re asking the court to punish you for not handing over the discoverable information.

What kind of sanctions could you face? Usually, it’s monetary. It might be the legal costs for making the discovery request you’re refusing to comply with, along with the legal costs associated with the motions to compel and for sanctions. In a typical case, this will be a few hundred to a few thousand dollars.

In some cases, the sanctions could be more severe, like an adverse inference jury instruction. Here, the court will tell the jury that they are to assume that the information you couldn’t produce during discovery would be detrimental to your case. In extreme cases, your case could get dismissed. But throwing out a case as a discovery sanction is very rare.

Summing It Up

In a civil suit, if something is reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence, it’ll be fair game in discovery. This includes private social media accounts, medical records and text messages. So in deciding whether or not to sue someone, factor your potential loss of privacy into your decision-making process.

Share this post

Latest Articles

The Biggest Theft That Nobody Is Talking About

The Biggest Theft That Nobody Is Talking About

At a time when billionaire extraordinaire Elon Musk is dominating headlines with his multi-billion-dollar buying spree, there is another story worth billions that is curiously absent from our Twitter feeds. Unfortunately, rather than recount the spending of riches, this story tells the tale of one of the greatest thefts in American history. Every hour, millions …

The Biggest Theft That Nobody Is Talking About Read More »

Maryland Passes Two Bills To Strengthen Anti-discrimination and Harassment Protection In The Workplace

Maryland Passes Two Bills To Strengthen Anti-discrimination and Harassment Protection In The Workplace

Last night the Maryland General Assembly passed two bills, SB 450 and SB 451, which will increase protections for victims of harassment and discrimination in the workplace.  SB 450 eliminates the ‘severe or pervasive’ standard for harassment claims and creates a new standard for harassment claims in the workplace. The prior ‘severe or pervasive’ standard …

Maryland Passes Two Bills To Strengthen Anti-discrimination and Harassment Protection In The Workplace Read More »

DMV Survey Series: Wage Theft Edition

DMV Survey Series: Wage Theft Edition

*In this series, the author will explore the differences in specific areas of the law between D.C., Maryland, and Virginia, and hopefully answer the age-old question: which state is best for employees? Please remember that this blog post, like all of our posts, offers general information and is NOT legal advice. – Upon reading this …

DMV Survey Series: Wage Theft Edition Read More »

The Supreme Court Decides to Block and Uphold Biden’s Vaccination Mandates

The Supreme Court Decides to Block and Uphold Biden’s Vaccination Mandates

On January 13, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court made two major decisions. These related to President Biden’s attempts to increase the number of workers who are fully vaccinated against the coronavirus. The first decision temporarily blocked the vaccinate-or-test regulation that applied to employers with 100 or more employees. The second decision allowed the vaccination requirement …

The Supreme Court Decides to Block and Uphold Biden’s Vaccination Mandates Read More »

Talk To A Real Person

Talk To A Real Person