Employer Seeks Dismissal of Discrimination Case, Tampering With Company Computer Alleged
Claims and counter-claims are part of the litigation process. A California federal court judge will need to consider alleged sexual harassment by an attorney, with the victim being an attorney, retaliation and possible destruction of evidence. Both sides carry the burden of proving the legal claims they’ve filed against each other. iGate Technologies, Inc., is facing a lawsuit filed by their former attorney, Karetha Dodd, who claims the company’s general counsel, MukundSrinath, repeatedly propositioned her for sex, according to an article in The Recorder. The company, an information technology outsourcing company based in India, denies the allegations and is counter-suing Dodd for violating the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act claiming she and her attorney wiped data from her company issued laptop before returning it to iGate. In her lawsuit in federal court in California Dodd claims Srinath,- Pressured her to have a sexual affair,
- Forcibly kissed her and put her hand on his genitals,
- Withheld a promotion after she refused to meet with him alone, and
- Retaliated against her after she told an outside lawyer about his conduct.
- Defendants may pursue a very vigorous defense and claim you acted improperly, unethically or illegally, whether that’s true or not, so you don’t deserve a decision in your favor.
- In cases of illegal discrimination where a complaint was made to the employer and the employee suffered as a result, there may also be a retaliation claim. These two claims should be judged on their own, so the outcomes are independent of each other.

