SPLF Employment Blog

an employee in an office packing his belongings into a cardboard box

The Four Critical Mistakes People Make When Quitting A Job

It might be an understatement, but it’s safe to say that the coronavirus dramatically affected the employment landscape. One of the biggest ways is in the increase in telecommuting and the workers’ desire to continue using it. For example, almost 40% of workers say they would consider quitting their current job if they couldn’t continue working remotely at least part-time.

But not all employers are happy to have so many employees working from home. Many companies, such as those on Wall Street, want their employees back in their offices as soon as possible. So it looks like we might see a situation where a relatively large proportion of employees will quit. In fact, it looks like this trend has already begun.

The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) reported that 4 million people voluntarily quit their jobs in April 2021. This is the highest number ever reported to the BLS since they started recording this statistic in 2000.

If you’re thinking about quitting your current job, there are four potential legal mistakes you could be making if you’re not careful.

Mistake #1: Ignoring Restrictive Covenants

Most restrictive covenants in employment law place limits on what an employee can do, typically after they leave their current job. There are three main types of restrictive covenants that apply to employees:

  • Non-compete:  Also called a non-competition agreement, these stop former employees from taking a new job that’s in direct competition with the former employer. Non-compete agreements will normally apply to a particular industry, in a specified geographical area and for a set period of time.
  • Non-solicitation: These agreements typically prohibit employees from soliciting coworkers or clients from the former employer for a certain amount of time. When applied to the solicitation of fellow employees, this restrictive covenant may go by other names, such as a no-hire or anti-raiding provision.
  • Non-disclosure: Also referred to as a confidentiality agreement, this bars former employees from revealing confidential information. This information may include trade secrets or other forms of proprietary information of the employer or the employer’s clients.

Before deciding to quit, make sure you identify if any of these employment agreements apply to you. If they do, confirm your understanding of how they will affect you at your new job.

When negotiating the details of your departure, see if you can renegotiate these agreements. For instance, you might forego certain benefits or bonuses in return for reducing the length of time a restrictive covenant applies to you.

Mistake #2: Forgetting About the Employment Contract

Most workers in the United States are employed at-will. This means that subject to a few exceptions, they can be fired or quit at any time and for any reason (or no reason at all). So it’s sometimes possible for people to forget that they might be working subject to an employment contract.

These contracts will set out the terms of your employment, including how long you will work for your employer. They may also list conditions that must be met, like completing a specific project. Then there could be provisions that set out the amount of notice you must provide your employer if you decide to quit.

If you decide to quit in a manner that violates your employment contract, you could be sacrificing a lot more than you anticipate. There could be a future bonus that you’re forfeiting or liquidated damages that you could be subject to. There’s also the possibility that your decision to leave could impose certain financial losses on your employer.

For example, let’s say you were earning $8,000 per month for 12 months under your contract. But then you decided to leave after six months in breach of your contract.

This meant your employer had to find your replacement to work for them for the remaining six months. Yet due to the desperate need for your replacement, they had to pay this new person $10,000 per month.

If your employer decided to sue you for breach of contract, part of their claimed damages would include $12,000. This amounts to the extra $2,000 a month they had to pay the replacement worker for six months. If applicable, they might also have a legal claim for lost profits, as well as reimbursement of attorney’s fees and court costs.

Mistake #3: Taking Company Property

Most of you already know that if your employer gave you a company car, smartphone or laptop, you probably need to return those things when you quit. But what about client lists, trade secrets or other forms of valuable information that you might already have in your head or on your computer at home?

Oh, you never signed a non-solicitation or non-disclosure agreement, so you can do whatever you want with that information? Not so fast. There are still two potential legal hurdles that may prevent you from taking advantage of that information.

First, using that information could be a breach of a fiduciary duty. Some states have laws that could make certain activities, such as taking a former employer’s clients, a violation of an employee’s fiduciary duty to his or her (former) employer. This could apply even if no restrictive covenant prohibited it.

These violations often occur when the employee is still working for the former employer. Some states will find certain types of behavior permissible, but only if done after quitting. It’s only when they’re done while still working for the former employer, that a court might conclude that it’s a breach of the employee’s fiduciary duty.

Second, there could be laws in place specifically prohibiting what the employee wants to do. In the case of intellectual property, there’s the Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016 (DTSA). This law provides, among other things, employers with a federal civil cause of action against their current or former employees for trade secret misappropriation. There may also be state trade secrets laws that apply to any attempt by a former employee to misuse trade secrets.

Mistake #4: Quitting Before Getting Wrongfully Terminated

Working may not be the most pleasant experience. But that doesn’t mean it’s okay for employers to mistreat their employees, especially when the mistreatment violates state or federal law.

Sometimes, the discrimination, harassment or retaliation could get so bad at work, you want to quit. That’s certainly your decision, and a very personal one. However, before you quit, make sure you fully understand the context in which you’ve made this decision.

Specifically, are you quitting before you think you might be wrongfully terminated in the near future? Maybe you filed a complaint at work about the discrimination you felt you were facing. And ever since you made the complaint, your boss has been giving you fewer and fewer assignments, under the guise of less work being available.

If you feel that you’re about to get fired in retaliation for filing that complaint, it may be best not to quit. It will significantly hinder your ability to argue that you were wrongfully discharged as well as reduce the amount of evidence you’ll have if making a retaliation claim. Additionally, even if you have a successful lawsuit, your damages will be reduced because you won’t be eligible to recover lost wages.

Bottom Line

This article isn’t about trying to convince you that you shouldn’t quit your job. Rather, its purpose is to identify potential considerations you may have overlooked when you decided to resign. Whether it’s talking to your spouse one more time about leaving your job or doing some research online about your employment rights and obligations, you want your decision to quit to be as informed as possible.

Share this post

Latest Articles

The Biggest Theft That Nobody Is Talking About

The Biggest Theft That Nobody Is Talking About

At a time when billionaire extraordinaire Elon Musk is dominating headlines with his multi-billion-dollar buying spree, there is another story worth billions that is curiously absent from our Twitter feeds. Unfortunately, rather than recount the spending of riches, this story tells the tale of one of the greatest thefts in American history. Every hour, millions …

The Biggest Theft That Nobody Is Talking About Read More »

Maryland Passes Two Bills To Strengthen Anti-discrimination and Harassment Protection In The Workplace

Maryland Passes Two Bills To Strengthen Anti-discrimination and Harassment Protection In The Workplace

Last night the Maryland General Assembly passed two bills, SB 450 and SB 451, which will increase protections for victims of harassment and discrimination in the workplace.  SB 450 eliminates the ‘severe or pervasive’ standard for harassment claims and creates a new standard for harassment claims in the workplace. The prior ‘severe or pervasive’ standard …

Maryland Passes Two Bills To Strengthen Anti-discrimination and Harassment Protection In The Workplace Read More »

DMV Survey Series: Wage Theft Edition

DMV Survey Series: Wage Theft Edition

*In this series, the author will explore the differences in specific areas of the law between D.C., Maryland, and Virginia, and hopefully answer the age-old question: which state is best for employees? Please remember that this blog post, like all of our posts, offers general information and is NOT legal advice. – Upon reading this …

DMV Survey Series: Wage Theft Edition Read More »

The Supreme Court Decides to Block and Uphold Biden’s Vaccination Mandates

The Supreme Court Decides to Block and Uphold Biden’s Vaccination Mandates

On January 13, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court made two major decisions. These related to President Biden’s attempts to increase the number of workers who are fully vaccinated against the coronavirus. The first decision temporarily blocked the vaccinate-or-test regulation that applied to employers with 100 or more employees. The second decision allowed the vaccination requirement …

The Supreme Court Decides to Block and Uphold Biden’s Vaccination Mandates Read More »

Talk To A Real Person

Talk To A Real Person