SPLF Employment Blog

hate speech

Can You Be Fired for Hate Speech? Doesn’t the First Amendment Protect Speech?

hate speechThe nation watched with sorrow in August as a white nationalist march in Charlottesville, Virginia turned violent, resulting in one woman’s death. The public backlash was immediate, with participants being outed on social media and their hate speech reported to their employers. At least four people returned home to find that they’d lost their jobs amid the outcry.

But wait: isn’t speech protected under the First Amendment? How can people be fired from work for exercising their constitutional rights?

Of course, free speech is a central American freedom. The problem is that if you’re a private sector employee, the First Amendment—like all of the Bill of Rights—doesn’t mean much for your day-to-day life, especially not at work. Let’s dive into why that is.

The First Amendment

The First Amendment protects all citizens from government intrusion on their speech. It states, in full:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Note that this prohibition applies only to what the government can do—not to what private citizens can or can’t do. So, to make an analogy, the government can’t restrict your right to buy a firearm under the Second Amendment. That doesn’t have any effect on whether your spouse can say “I won’t live in a house with a gun.” It’s only the government that can’t limit your freedom under the Bill of Rights.

Private employers, then, can never violate the First Amendment because it doesn’t apply to them. Therefore, they can absolutely restrict their employees’ speech without running into a constitutional problem.

What if you’re a government employee, though?

Generally speaking, government employees—such as police officers, court clerks, or administrators in city hall—do enjoy protected speech under the First Amendment. But that protection is limited: if speech demonstrates that a government employee wouldn’t be able to fairly do his job, that employee can still be legally fired for engaging in hate speech. So, if a police officer participated in a white nationalist rally, her department might conclude that she could not lawfully and neutrally engage with citizens of different races and therefore could not properly do her job as a police officer.

Hate Speech—and the Problems It Creates for Employers

To be clear, we’re speaking here specifically of hate speech, or “speech that offends, threatens, or insults groups, based on race, color, religion, national origin, sexual orientation, disability, or other traits.” And while the Charlottesville example obviously centered on participation in a white nationalist rally, what you post on social media—even on your own personal page—could also be hate speech if it attacks a specific group of people.

The Charlottesville situation also highlights how easy it is for your “private” activities to become public and to make their way back to your job. You may not mean to advertise to your boss what you do in your free time, but today you can’t take anonymity for granted. Moreover, nothing you post on social media is private!

If your activities reflect poorly on your employer, your boss might decide to let you go rather than suffer the loss of business caused by a controversy. As Bloomberg reported, “White supremacists in the workplace are problems for their employers. They can tarnish the reputation of an organization, create a hostile work environment for nonwhite workers, and counteract diversity and inclusion initiatives.” A business might logically decide that there is a greater risk in keeping an employee with racist or homophobic views on board, especially if that person is in a supervisory position.

To proactively address these concerns, many companies have created specific social media policies governing what employees may or may not say on social media as well as anti-discrimination policies that memorialize the company’s position on racist or homophobic speech and make it clear that behavior, including speech, that contradicts those values is not tolerated.

Summing It Up

  • The First Amendment means that the government can’t shut your speech down or prevent you from speaking—but it doesn’t prevent the rest of the world from reacting to your speech.
  • Private sector employees can be fired for hate speech.
  • Even government employees can probably be fired for hate speech if it interferes with their ability to do their jobs.
  • You may think that your employer won’t know whether you participate in a particular march or event or whether you post something on the web, but remember that in this day of cameras and social media, your identity and your employer can probably be easily discerned.

Were you fired for speech that you think should have been protected? Or do you work with someone who’s creating a hostile workplace environment for you with their own hate speech? Please contact our office for help understanding your legal rights and options.

Share this post

Latest Articles

The Biggest Theft That Nobody Is Talking About

The Biggest Theft That Nobody Is Talking About

At a time when billionaire extraordinaire Elon Musk is dominating headlines with his multi-billion-dollar buying spree, there is another story worth billions that is curiously absent from our Twitter feeds. Unfortunately, rather than recount the spending of riches, this story tells the tale of one of the greatest thefts in American history. Every hour, millions …

The Biggest Theft That Nobody Is Talking About Read More »

Maryland Passes Two Bills To Strengthen Anti-discrimination and Harassment Protection In The Workplace

Maryland Passes Two Bills To Strengthen Anti-discrimination and Harassment Protection In The Workplace

Last night the Maryland General Assembly passed two bills, SB 450 and SB 451, which will increase protections for victims of harassment and discrimination in the workplace.  SB 450 eliminates the ‘severe or pervasive’ standard for harassment claims and creates a new standard for harassment claims in the workplace. The prior ‘severe or pervasive’ standard …

Maryland Passes Two Bills To Strengthen Anti-discrimination and Harassment Protection In The Workplace Read More »

DMV Survey Series: Wage Theft Edition

DMV Survey Series: Wage Theft Edition

*In this series, the author will explore the differences in specific areas of the law between D.C., Maryland, and Virginia, and hopefully answer the age-old question: which state is best for employees? Please remember that this blog post, like all of our posts, offers general information and is NOT legal advice. – Upon reading this …

DMV Survey Series: Wage Theft Edition Read More »

The Supreme Court Decides to Block and Uphold Biden’s Vaccination Mandates

The Supreme Court Decides to Block and Uphold Biden’s Vaccination Mandates

On January 13, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court made two major decisions. These related to President Biden’s attempts to increase the number of workers who are fully vaccinated against the coronavirus. The first decision temporarily blocked the vaccinate-or-test regulation that applied to employers with 100 or more employees. The second decision allowed the vaccination requirement …

The Supreme Court Decides to Block and Uphold Biden’s Vaccination Mandates Read More »

Talk To A Real Person

Talk To A Real Person