PRACTICE LOCATIONS: VA, DC, MD, NY, NC[email protected]
  • 202-980-3857202-980-3857

SPLF Employment Blog

Do You Need a Lawyer?

Employment Lawyers in Virginia

Litigants representing themselves are said by the legal system to be acting pro se, or “for one’s self.” It is certainly possible to bring a discrimination claim without an attorney. Indeed, I once took over a case for a pro se litigant after she had handled the case alone in federal court for more than a year. But she was a retired lawyer and able to devote herself full time to the litigation. The better course of action is to hire an attorney with experience in discrimination cases, even if you have to file on your own at first.

The Risks of Self-Representation

The EEOC often deals with individuals representing themselves. Individuals can also represent themselves in any court, though given the procedural rules, this can be difficult. If you find yourself in a pinch—for instance, if the statute of limitations is about to run out—you can file a lawsuit on your own and then try to find a lawyer. But proceeding on a case without a lawyer is perilous, as indicated by the result in Balas v. Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc., 711 F.3d 401 (4th Cir. 2013).

The employee in Balas claimed that her employer:

“subject[ed] her to an ongoing sexually hostile work environment that included unwanted requests from her supervisor for sex, numerous sexual comments, sexually explicit posters knowingly being allowed in [her] workplace, employees massaging one another, sexually offensive pictures, and unwanted touching.…” Her complaint centers on the actions of her supervisor, Brad Price, who, she alleges, “frequently and repeatedly commented to [her] about how much he liked her attire and physical appearance”; “referred to [her] as a ‘good woman’”; “frequently and repeatedly entered [her] small workspace and her personal space”; and

“frequently talked about his sex life to [her].” According to Balas’s complaint, “[i]n or around April 2009, Mr. Price solicited sex from [her].” Balas also claimed that Price forcibly hugged her, though she admitted that it was just after she had given him some cookies for Christmas.

Balas filed a charge with the EEOC. The EEOC, as it does in all cases, shared the charge with the employer. The charge did not include all the details that Balas shared with the EEOC: for instance, it did not include the time Balas’s boss asked her for sex. The Fourth Circuit upheld the trial court’s ruling that it could not consider anything other than the allegations in the EEOC charge. Thus, Balas was out of luck, even if it was true that her boss had asked her for sex.

For those who go to the EEOC, the lesson here is to make sure that the EEOC charge contains all the key allegations. Also, send the employer (by certified mail or other return-receipt method) everything that you share with the EEOC. In this case, Balas had sent the EEOC a letter and had shared more detail during the intake process. However, this information was not shared with the employer. As a result, she was not able to rely on this information for her lawsuit.

 The moral of this story: it can be difficult to find an attorney to handle a discrimination case, but keep at it. If you need to file with the EEOC before you are able to retain an attorney, make sure that your charge is as complete as possible. If you have been subjected to a continuing course of discrimination, make sure your charge reflects that. There should be a box to check for continuing discrimination. In addition, if you send material to the EEOC, copy your company’s human resources department so the company cannot argue that it was not notified of everything that happened to you.


Share this post

Latest Articles

The Biggest Theft That Nobody Is Talking About

The Biggest Theft That Nobody Is Talking About

At a time when billionaire extraordinaire Elon Musk is dominating headlines with his multi-billion-dollar buying spree, there is another story worth billions that is curiously absent from our Twitter feeds. Unfortunately, rather than recount the spending of riches, this story tells the tale of one of the greatest thefts in American history. Every hour, millions …

The Biggest Theft That Nobody Is Talking About Read More »

Maryland Passes Two Bills To Strengthen Anti-discrimination and Harassment Protection In The Workplace

Maryland Passes Two Bills To Strengthen Anti-discrimination and Harassment Protection In The Workplace

Last night the Maryland General Assembly passed two bills, SB 450 and SB 451, which will increase protections for victims of harassment and discrimination in the workplace.  SB 450 eliminates the ‘severe or pervasive’ standard for harassment claims and creates a new standard for harassment claims in the workplace. The prior ‘severe or pervasive’ standard …

Maryland Passes Two Bills To Strengthen Anti-discrimination and Harassment Protection In The Workplace Read More »

DMV Survey Series: Wage Theft Edition

DMV Survey Series: Wage Theft Edition

*In this series, the author will explore the differences in specific areas of the law between D.C., Maryland, and Virginia, and hopefully answer the age-old question: which state is best for employees? Please remember that this blog post, like all of our posts, offers general information and is NOT legal advice. – Upon reading this …

DMV Survey Series: Wage Theft Edition Read More »

The Supreme Court Decides to Block and Uphold Biden’s Vaccination Mandates

The Supreme Court Decides to Block and Uphold Biden’s Vaccination Mandates

On January 13, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court made two major decisions. These related to President Biden’s attempts to increase the number of workers who are fully vaccinated against the coronavirus. The first decision temporarily blocked the vaccinate-or-test regulation that applied to employers with 100 or more employees. The second decision allowed the vaccination requirement …

The Supreme Court Decides to Block and Uphold Biden’s Vaccination Mandates Read More »

Talk To A Real Person