PRACTICE LOCATIONS: VA, DC, MD, NY, NC

contact@spigglelaw.comcontact@spigglelaw.com
  • TALK TO A REAL PERSON
  • 202-980-3857202-980-3857

SPLF Employment Blog

EEOC Files Lawsuit on Behalf of Job Applicant With Cerebral Palsy

Employment discrimination can occur at any time, even before someone becomes an employee. This can occur during the job application process, although it usually goes unnoticed. 

If illegal discrimination results in a job rejection, the employer rarely provides the real reason for choosing another candidate. Instead, the employer will use some generic language thanking them for applying and wishing them the best of luck in future endeavors. But in a few cases, the employer will admit the real reason for rejecting a potential hire, even when that reason is illegal. 

EEOC v. The Pai Corp.

The defendant in this lawsuit is The Pai Corporation, which is more commonly known as Excentia Human Services (Excentia). Excentia is in the business of providing special needs services to adults and children. To help accomplish its mission, Excentia operates the S. June Smith Center, which focuses on helping children with developmental needs and autism.

According to the complaint, Stevie Baum (Baum) applied for a preschool teaching assistant position in February 2020. Her first interview went well, so she was called back for a second interview in March 2020. 

The second interview took place onsite where Baum would be potentially working. Despite her belief that the second interview went well, a few days later Baum received an email saying Excentia would be hiring someone else. Nothing in the email explained why Excentia chose not to hire Baum.

Seeking an explanation, Baum called Excentia and was told she wasn’t hired due to concerns about how her cerebral palsy might interfere with her ability to do her job. Baum followed up that telephone call with an email asking Excentia to reconsider its decision, but got no response.

After conciliation failed, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) filed a lawsuit on Baum’s behalf. In addition to claiming disability discrimination, the EEOC requested:

  • Lost wages
  • Compensatory damages
  • Punitive damages
  • Injunctive relief, such as Excentia instituting policies to prevent disability discrimination

Why the EEOC Is Filing a Lawsuit Instead of Stevie Baum

To best answer this question, let’s first start with how most EEOC charges (complaints) get handled. The process typically starts with someone filing a complaint with the EEOC.

Depending on the case, the EEOC may then reach out to the individual and employer and offer mediation. If mediation doesn’t work or isn’t offered, the EEOC will ask the employer to respond to the individual’s complaint. Next, an investigation takes place. 

After the investigation, the EEOC decides if there was discrimination. If the EEOC concludes there wasn’t, the individual can still file a lawsuit if they want to continue the case.

If discrimination is found, the EEOC will issue a Letter of Determination and explain its findings to the employer and individual. The EEOC will then try to get both sides to settle the matter with a confidential process called conciliation. 

If a settlement isn’t possible, the EEOC will either sue the employer on the individual’s behalf or allow the individual to file a lawsuit.

The vast majority of complaints to the EEOC do not result in the EEOC suing the employer. In the 2020 fiscal year, there were 67,448 charges filed with the EEOC. Of these charges, only 93 ended up in litigation where the EEOC was the plaintiff. 

So what makes the EEOC decide to file suit instead of letting the individual do it? There are several reasons.

First, the EEOC thinks it has a strong case. The EEOC has limited resources, so it’s usually only going to bring cases to court it’s confident it can win.

Second, there might be a novel question of law that hasn’t been considered by the courts yet. If the EEOC wants a court to make a decision on a particular issue (which could apply to later cases), the EEOC might file a suit themselves to make it more likely they can get an outcome to prevent future discrimination.

Third, there could be political and/or social motivations. For instance, if the White House wants to advocate on behalf of a certain minority group, the EEOC might be more willing to sue in cases involving a member of that minority group. Or, the EEOC wants to shed light on a particular legal issue the EEOC wants the public to know about.

Fourth, the EEOC wants injunctive relief. Depending on the case, most private litigants will focus on recovering monetary damages. 

But private litigants often don’t ask for injunctive relief, which the EEOC may want to prevent future discrimination. For example, in a recent sexual harassment and retaliation case, one of the legal remedies the EEOC asks for is that the employer implement new policies to prevent sexual harassment and discrimination. 

The EEOC also wants that company to hire an ombudsman to investigate future sexual harassment and retaliation claims. This includes submitting a report to the EEOC about what the ombudsman observed and the type of complaints received.

Summing It Up

Sometimes the EEOC will file suit on the individual’s behalf. They might do this if they think they have a strong case, want a particular legal remedy and/or want to make a statement with the lawsuit. But most of the time, they leave it up to the individual to make that decision and handle the subsequent litigation.

Share this post

Latest Articles

DMV Survey Series: Wage Theft Edition

DMV Survey Series: Wage Theft Edition

*In this series, the author will explore the differences in specific areas of the law between D.C., Maryland, and Virginia, and hopefully answer the age-old question: which state is best for employees? Please remember that this blog post, like all of our posts, offers general information and is NOT legal advice. – Upon reading this …

DMV Survey Series: Wage Theft Edition Read More »

The Supreme Court Decides to Block and Uphold Biden’s Vaccination Mandates

The Supreme Court Decides to Block and Uphold Biden’s Vaccination Mandates

On January 13, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court made two major decisions. These related to President Biden’s attempts to increase the number of workers who are fully vaccinated against the coronavirus. The first decision temporarily blocked the vaccinate-or-test regulation that applied to employers with 100 or more employees. The second decision allowed the vaccination requirement …

The Supreme Court Decides to Block and Uphold Biden’s Vaccination Mandates Read More »

Top Employment Law Trends To Watch In 2022

Top Employment Law Trends To Watch In 2022

We all thought 2020 was an eventful year but it turns out that was just the start; 2021 had its fair share of surprises and noteworthy news stories. As we head into 2022, it looks we’re in for another interesting year in terms of employment law. Below are some of the potential trends, stories, and …

Top Employment Law Trends To Watch In 2022 Read More »

Legal Challenges to OSHA’s Vaccination and Testing Emergency Temporary Standard

Legal Challenges to OSHA’s Vaccination and Testing Emergency Temporary Standard

If you’re aware of the coronavirus pandemic, chances are pretty high you’re also aware that Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) just announced its COVID-19 Vaccination and Testing Emergency Temporary Standard (Vaccine and Testing ETS). This regulation would require most employers with 100 or more employees to either mandate the coronavirus vaccine for their employees …

Legal Challenges to OSHA’s Vaccination and Testing Emergency Temporary Standard Read More »

Talk To A Real Person